Legislature(1999 - 2000)

05/12/1999 06:15 PM House FIN

Audio Topic
* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
txt
CS FOR SENATE BILL NO. 133(RLS) am                                                                                              
                                                                                                                                
"An Act creating and relating to the Regulatory                                                                                 
Commission of Alaska and transferring to it certain                                                                             
powers and duties of the Alaska Public Utilities                                                                                
Commission; repealing the Alaska Public Utilities                                                                               
Commission; relating to the powers of the chair of the                                                                          
Regulatory Commission of Alaska; relating to regulatory                                                                         
cost charges for public utilities and pipelines;                                                                                
relating to the appellate procedures of the Regulatory                                                                          
Commission of Alaska; relating to the Alaska Oil and                                                                            
Gas Conservation Commission; and providing for an                                                                               
effective date."                                                                                                                
                                                                                                                                
Co-Chair Therriault MOVED to ADOPT Amendment 2 (copy on                                                                         
file). Representative Grussendorf OBJECTED.                                                                                     
                                                                                                                                
PAT CARTER, STAFF, SENATOR PEARCE explained Amendment 2. He                                                                     
observed that the amendment removes section 28, which                                                                           
authorizes the new Regulatory Commission of Alaska to employ                                                                    
one additional hearing office. He noted that this position                                                                      
is in the operating budget as passed by both bodies. The                                                                        
language is redundant.                                                                                                          
                                                                                                                                
There being NO OBJECTION, Amendment 2 was adopted.                                                                              
                                                                                                                                
Amendment 3 was WITHDRAWN.                                                                                                      
                                                                                                                                
Representative J. Davies MOVED to ADOPT Amendment 4 (copy on                                                                    
file). The amendment would add the following language in                                                                        
section 7:                                                                                                                      
                                                                                                                                
"A party may file a petition for reconsideration of, or                                                                         
an administrative appeal of, a decision by a hearing                                                                            
officer, an arbitrator, or an administrative law judge                                                                          
that has been approved by the commission, or a decision                                                                         
of a hearing panel.  The full commission shall act on                                                                           
the petition for reconsideration or the appeal."                                                                                
                                                                                                                                
There being NO OBJECTION, Amendment 4 was adopted.                                                                              
                                                                                                                                
Co-Chair Therriault MOVED to ADOPT Amendment 5 (copy on                                                                         
file). Amendment 5 would change the sunset date from the                                                                        
year 2004 to 2002. It was the intent of Co-Chair Therriault                                                                     
that the legislature review the transition of APUC.                                                                             
                                                                                                                                
There being NO OBJECTION, it was so ordered.                                                                                    
                                                                                                                                
Co-Chair Therriault MOVED to ADOPT the following House                                                                          
Finance Committee Letter of Intent:                                                                                             
                                                                                                                                
SB 133 repeals the Alaska Public Utilities Commission                                                                           
and creates the Regulatory Commission of Alaska. In                                                                             
making this change to public utility regulation, it is                                                                          
the intent of the Legislature to respond to                                                                                     
recommendations in legislative audits conducted in                                                                              
1979, 1985 and 1989, and an audit performed by the                                                                              
National Regulatory Research Institute (NRRI) in 1998.                                                                          
The task of regulating public utilities has changed                                                                             
dramatically as the utility industry has moved from                                                                             
total regulation to regulated competition. The 21st                                                                             
Alaska Legislature is creating the Regulatory                                                                                   
Commission of Alaska to address these changes in the                                                                            
utility industry on behalf of the people of the state                                                                           
of Alaska.                                                                                                                      
                                                                                                                                
The Regulatory Commission of Alaska is better equipped                                                                          
than the APUC to respond to industry proposals for                                                                              
changes in utility services, and to protect the                                                                                 
interests of ratepayers in the wake of these changes.                                                                           
SB 133 gives the chair authority over administrative                                                                            
matters, leaving the other commissioners free to                                                                                
resolve substantive issues. To address the problem of                                                                           
the APUC's case backlog and time-consuming                                                                                      
decision-making process, SB 133 allows panels of three                                                                          
commissioners, hearing officers or arbitrators to                                                                               
resolve cases where appropriate. It also requires the                                                                           
RCA to adopt regulations setting procedural timelines.                                                                          
To address the problems created by changing APUC                                                                                
staff's role between advocate and advisor, it                                                                                   
establishes a separate public advocacy section within                                                                           
the RCA.                                                                                                                        
                                                                                                                                
SB 133 will improve this agency's accountability to the                                                                         
public. The RCA is required to establish a Management                                                                           
Information System, similar to the Legislature's BASIS                                                                          
system so that the public and industry can be better                                                                            
informed about the RCA's proceedings. It requires the                                                                           
RCA to implement a time management system to record the                                                                         
amount of time spent on filings from different                                                                                  
industries, so that the Regulatory Cost Charge can be                                                                           
more fairly assessed.                                                                                                           
                                                                                                                                
This year is an opportune time to make these changes.                                                                           
The Alaska Public Utilities Commission would begin                                                                              
winding down on June 30, 1999 under the sunset law. SB
133 requires the governor to appoint, and the                                                                                   
Legislature to confirm, five commissioners who will                                                                             
represent the interests of the public.                                                                                          
                                                                                                                                
SB 133 provides for a study of the possibility of                                                                               
combining the functions of the Regulatory Commission of                                                                         
Alaska and the Alaska Oil and Gas Conservation                                                                                  
Commission.  The results of a study by the Legislative                                                                          
Budget and Audit Committee will be presented to the                                                                             
next session of this Legislature.  If the Legislature                                                                           
decides to combine the two agencies' functions, the                                                                             
challenge of making that transition will be                                                                                     
significantly eased by the creation and operating                                                                               
experience of the RCA under SB 133.                                                                                             
                                                                                                                                
Mr. Carter observed that the letter of intent sets into the                                                                     
record all the reasons for establishing a new commission and                                                                    
the structure changes.                                                                                                          
                                                                                                                                
There being NO OBJECTION, the letter of intent was adopted.                                                                     
                                                                                                                                
Mr. Carter noted that Alaska Regulatory Commission should be                                                                    
the Regulatory Commission of Alaska.                                                                                            
                                                                                                                                
Representative Foster expressed concern with the performance                                                                    
of the past executive director of the APUC. Mr. Carter                                                                          
reiterated that the intent is to clarify that staff takes                                                                       
direction from the chairman of the commission.                                                                                  
                                                                                                                                
MIKE TIBBLES, STAFF, REPRESENTATIVE THERRIAULT reviewed the                                                                     
fiscal note for the Alaska Oil and Gas Conservation                                                                             
Commission (AOGCC) fiscal note. There is a $147 thousand                                                                        
dollar general fund request in the contractual line for                                                                         
lease costs. There is a $321.9 thousand dollar capital                                                                          
request for moving costs.                                                                                                       
                                                                                                                                
Co-Chair Therriault explained that the SB 133 fiscal note                                                                       
would be zeroed out in the conference committee if SB 134                                                                       
and SB 133 pass.                                                                                                                
                                                                                                                                
Representative J. Davies observed that the intent is to fund                                                                    
the request.                                                                                                                    
                                                                                                                                
Mr. Carter explained that the fiscal note reflects the                                                                          
changes to the legislation.                                                                                                     
                                                                                                                                
Representative J. Davies MOVED to ADOPT Amendment 6 (copy on                                                                    
file).  Co-Chair Therriault OBJECTED. Representative J.                                                                         
Davies explained that the amendment would add a person to                                                                       
represent the interest of the public.                                                                                           
                                                                                                                                
Co-Chair Therriault spoke against the amendment. He                                                                             
emphasized that all of the members are present to represent                                                                     
the consumer. There is also a separate public advocacy                                                                          
section. Mr. Carter added that every audit reaffirms that                                                                       
APUC was created to protect the interests of the public. Co-                                                                    
Chair Therriault noted that the current language is                                                                             
acceptable to the Administration. Representatives                                                                               
Grussendorf and J. Davies argued in support of the                                                                              
amendment. Vice-Chair Bunde spoke against the amendment.                                                                        
                                                                                                                                
A roll call vote was taken on the motion.                                                                                       
                                                                                                                                
IN FAVOR: Davies, Grussendorf                                                                                                   
OPPOSED: Bunde, Davis, Foster, Kohring, Austerman,                                                                              
Therriault, Mulder                                                                                                              
                                                                                                                                
Representatives Williams and Moses were absent from the                                                                         
vote.                                                                                                                           
                                                                                                                                
The MOTION FAILED (2-7).                                                                                                        
                                                                                                                                
Representative Foster MOVED to report HCS CSSB 133 (FIN) out                                                                    
of Committee with the accompanying fiscal notes. There being                                                                    
NO OBJECTION, it was so ordered.                                                                                                
                                                                                                                                
CSSB 133(RLS) am was REPORTED out of Committee with a "do                                                                       
pass" recommendation and with two new fiscal impact notes,                                                                      
one by the Department of Commerce and one by the Economic                                                                       
Development and Department of Administration.                                                                                   

Document Name Date/Time Subjects